This past weekend the nation's top prospects were on display at the CFL Combine. There were also a number of European players looking to make their mark as CFL 2.0 takes its next step forward. By the way, the term 2.0 is grossly misused these days. It comes from software versions where various iterations would be released. 1.0, 1.1, 1.5, 2.0, 2.1, etc... But now we just skip over all the iterations and go right to 2.0. If there was nothing between 1 and 2 you can just drop the .0
Well you probably didn't come here for random rants about trivial things in life that bother me. And if you did I have a great rant about when people misuse the word "humbling" when getting an award. Anyway how about some actual football talk.
The combine got me thinking about the current state of the Riders' Canadian talent and where they might be looking to add heading into the draft.
The addition of Dakota Shepley is huge and really shores up our OL depth. You can never have enough depth there but with Shepley in the fold longterm, I like where we are at there. We are also deep at Canadian LB. Judge may be the only starter but Hurl is a good rotation guy. Gagne and Chevrier are great on special teams and could be rewarded with some time on D. We also have Bartlett and Teitz. I also like how we sit in terms of our starting 7. Three on the OL. Evans, Judge and Edem on D (all impact players). Provided we can find a token Cdn Receiver, we are looking pretty good (which is a nice change from a couple years ago).
So what do we need?
Priority #1 - Receiver
We have a 34 year old Cory Watson and Mitch Picton. That's it. Technically you can add Lavoie to the mix but he is a mixture of a TE/FB/SB and is more a utility guy than a fulltime starter. Dan Clark could legitimately be the 3rd best Cdn WR on our roster. As mentioned above, short of adjusting our ratio, we will need to start a Cdn WR. So at this point its all on you Mitch Picton. Don't choke. We have actually lacked an actual quality Cdn WR since Demksi left. Harty would have been a great solution to this problem but health has not been on his side. We started Josh Stanford for goodness sake. We tried Bailey but he can't do anything but a jump ball deep. Rob Bagg was legitimately the best we've had for the past 2 years. I love Bagg (pause for immature giggle) but we need an injection of young talent here.
Priority #2 - Depth in the secondary
Skill testing question for you. Who is Mike Edem's back-up? It's a trick question, we have none. I guess technically Radford can play DB but that's in an emergency situation only. Edem is a great player and stayed healthy last season but at least bringing a second Canadian DB to training camp might be a good idea.
Priority #3 - Depth at D-line
Unlike DB we at least have some depth behind Zach Evans. Makana Henry is a solid depth player. But last year we also had Eddie Steele and currently we have yet to replace him. Jordan Reaves usually makes the roster but he is mostly just a special teams guy. We drafted and have been grooming Breton and Mufata but I'm not ready to just assume they are now good to go. Not a pressing need but certainly worth addressing.
Monday, March 25, 2019
Monday, March 18, 2019
Monday Morning Sentimonies: The Ratio
While the CFL fan base is notorious for being friendly, welcoming and camaraderie spanning team alliances, they are still prone to some pretty intense disagreements (often about super trivial things). Moving the season up? Divisive. CFL 2.0? Divisive. Is Kavis Reed an idiot or just incompetent? Divisive. Even the beloved Rouge can be a divisive issue. As such, few issues can unite them almost unanimously. This past weekend we found one of those issues... the ratio.
It was reported that there was agreement in principle at the bargaining table to reduce the number of Canadian starters from 7 to 5. Now before I get into my thoughts on the issue, let me just say that some have rightly surmised that this is nothing more than a deliberate tactic meant to divide and weaken the CFLPA at a key time. Who would benefit from such division and thus be willing to "leak" this information? Well I'll let you fill in the blanks.
But tactic or not, it has opened up a big conversation on the importance and merits of the ratio. Your first question might be "are you wearing pants while typing this?" I'll leave that one to your imagination. Your second question might be "Why would the CFLPA (who represents Canadian players) be willing to even consider this?" Remember that while half the league is Canadian, the other half are...? American. And with the exception of QBs, Canadian make more money than Americans. So the American half of the CFLPA would benefit greatly from less Canadian starting spots from a $$$ perspective. Also, the top Canadian would likely be unaffected as well. The Labattes, Laurents and Sinopolis of the world will still make top $ regardless of 5 vs. 7 spots. So its really only the fringe/depth Canadians who would be harmed by this. Not saying I like the idea, just pointing out why from a CFLPA perspective its something to think about.
As for me? Look, I get that from a business perspective and maybe even from a quality of product perspective this would be beneficial. I don't believe the quality of Canadian players is inferior (the top ones are as good as the ones south of the border that come up here). But the quantity of quality Canadian players is not necessarily there. Canadian depth is always an issue and it gets worse as the season wears on an injuries happen. Do you really think we would have let Josh Stanford on the field without the ratio? So I can see the allure.
But for all the operational sense this would make (for owners and players) it overlooks one important issue. Its a marketing nightmare. The CFL has become and longstanding Canadian institution thanks to a core of very dedicated fans. Fans who love Canadian football. Any attempt to reduce the Canadian portion of Canadian football does not make for a good headline and will not sit well with the core CFL fan base. While most of CFL's superstars are admittedly American, you need Canadians for fans to cheer for. Riderville is the shining example of this. Chris Szarka would get a standing O for a 2 yard run on first down. Every one of Jason Clermonts 7 receptions as a Rider led to a rash of pregnancies and babies named after him 9 months later. Parades are planned every time Rob Bagg catches a pass. We love our Canadians. Want another example? Because he is Canadian, people want so badly for Brandon Bridge to succeed that they are willing to overlook the fact that he isn't very good. I repeat, We love Canadians.
And so its in the CFL's best interest to maintain strong Canadian content and that does require the ratio. Would the top 4-5 Canadians still be on the starting roster without it? You bet. But reducing the ratio gives less opportunities for Canadians to shine. Less jobs for young players to aspire to. And less of what makes this league the CFL. Canadians. Zach Evans is likely never given the chance to develop from a raw junior player to the stud starter he is today with a 5 man ratio.
Are the 6th and 7th Canadian starters as good as American equivalents? In a lot of cases no. But Canadian pride has a lot more marketing value to the CFL than does the potential for a slightly better on field product.
It was reported that there was agreement in principle at the bargaining table to reduce the number of Canadian starters from 7 to 5. Now before I get into my thoughts on the issue, let me just say that some have rightly surmised that this is nothing more than a deliberate tactic meant to divide and weaken the CFLPA at a key time. Who would benefit from such division and thus be willing to "leak" this information? Well I'll let you fill in the blanks.
But tactic or not, it has opened up a big conversation on the importance and merits of the ratio. Your first question might be "are you wearing pants while typing this?" I'll leave that one to your imagination. Your second question might be "Why would the CFLPA (who represents Canadian players) be willing to even consider this?" Remember that while half the league is Canadian, the other half are...? American. And with the exception of QBs, Canadian make more money than Americans. So the American half of the CFLPA would benefit greatly from less Canadian starting spots from a $$$ perspective. Also, the top Canadian would likely be unaffected as well. The Labattes, Laurents and Sinopolis of the world will still make top $ regardless of 5 vs. 7 spots. So its really only the fringe/depth Canadians who would be harmed by this. Not saying I like the idea, just pointing out why from a CFLPA perspective its something to think about.
As for me? Look, I get that from a business perspective and maybe even from a quality of product perspective this would be beneficial. I don't believe the quality of Canadian players is inferior (the top ones are as good as the ones south of the border that come up here). But the quantity of quality Canadian players is not necessarily there. Canadian depth is always an issue and it gets worse as the season wears on an injuries happen. Do you really think we would have let Josh Stanford on the field without the ratio? So I can see the allure.
But for all the operational sense this would make (for owners and players) it overlooks one important issue. Its a marketing nightmare. The CFL has become and longstanding Canadian institution thanks to a core of very dedicated fans. Fans who love Canadian football. Any attempt to reduce the Canadian portion of Canadian football does not make for a good headline and will not sit well with the core CFL fan base. While most of CFL's superstars are admittedly American, you need Canadians for fans to cheer for. Riderville is the shining example of this. Chris Szarka would get a standing O for a 2 yard run on first down. Every one of Jason Clermonts 7 receptions as a Rider led to a rash of pregnancies and babies named after him 9 months later. Parades are planned every time Rob Bagg catches a pass. We love our Canadians. Want another example? Because he is Canadian, people want so badly for Brandon Bridge to succeed that they are willing to overlook the fact that he isn't very good. I repeat, We love Canadians.
And so its in the CFL's best interest to maintain strong Canadian content and that does require the ratio. Would the top 4-5 Canadians still be on the starting roster without it? You bet. But reducing the ratio gives less opportunities for Canadians to shine. Less jobs for young players to aspire to. And less of what makes this league the CFL. Canadians. Zach Evans is likely never given the chance to develop from a raw junior player to the stud starter he is today with a 5 man ratio.
Are the 6th and 7th Canadian starters as good as American equivalents? In a lot of cases no. But Canadian pride has a lot more marketing value to the CFL than does the potential for a slightly better on field product.
Monday, March 11, 2019
Monday Morning Sentimonies: Retro Sentimonies - Rider Prophet Salutes Bad Team Names
Sorry to break it to you but I'm still too lazy to write new content this week. So once once it is the blogging equivalent of a clip show.
Back in 2009 I dedicated a number of posts to saluting bad team names. The post below is the culmination of that salute.
I promise new content next week.
Rider Prophet Salutes Bad Team Names - Best In Show (Originally posted in 2009)
Well the offseason has come to a close so I guess it’s time for my offseason filler posts to end as well.
Back in 2009 I dedicated a number of posts to saluting bad team names. The post below is the culmination of that salute.
I promise new content next week.
Rider Prophet Salutes Bad Team Names - Best In Show (Originally posted in 2009)
Well the offseason has come to a close so I guess it’s time for my offseason filler posts to end as well.
For
the past 4 months I have been saluting bad team names from across the
sporting world. From high school up to the pros, from reputable leagues
to leagues you probably didn’t know existed and everything in between,
we’ve covered it all.
It’s time for our
final installment in the salute (pause for single tear). I’ll end this
salute with a look at my personal favourites. Enjoy, and thanks for
hanging in there through the long offseason and my corresponding
absolute lack of material.
Top 10 – Best In Show
10. University of Tennessee Volunteers (NCAA) –

I still find it hard to believe that such a reputable sports program developed out of such a bad team name.
9. University of Akron Zips (NCAA) –

As
you may have guessed, Zips is short for zippers… but you probably
didn’t guess that in this case zippers doesn’t refer to what holds your
coat together but rather rubber overshoes produced by BF Goodrich which
were popular in the 20s called “zippers”. Nothing says quality like a
shoe produced by a tire company and nothing says respectability like
naming a team after said shoes. As for what a kangaroo has to do with
all this… I have no idea.
8. Kansas City T-Bones (Minor Baseball) –

Little
known fact: Kansas City was actually given the name T-Bones by the
league commissioner. Another team wanted it, but the league wasn't
willing to have two teams with the same nickname so they decided to call
the other team the Kokos.
7. UC Santa Cruz Banana Slugs (NAIA) –

So… they’re slow, ugly and often covered in a mysterious sticky goo? Sounds like the girls at JD’s… zing!
6. Campbell Fighting Camels (NCAA) –

If
Michael Vick has taught us nothing (you know, other than Ron Mexico is
an awesome alias if you have to go the STD clinic), it’s that organized
animal fighting rings are probably illegal. But even if camel fighting
were legal, would it not be the most boring thing in the world. I mean
dogs and roosters are vicious so there’d at least be some action. What
are camels going to do? Stand there for weeks on end to see who dies of
thirst first?
5. Jacksonville State/ University of South Carolina Gamecocks (NCAA) –


While you are all used to regularly beating your cocks, this time around the Cocks will be beating you. Go Gamecocks!
4. University of Massachusetts Minutemen (NCAA) –
Evidently
U Mass athletes are not known for their stamina. Odds are the
All-American fantasy of the starting quarterback ending up with the head
cheerleader rarely plays out there.
3. Macon Whoopee (defunct ECHL) –

Macon
Whoopee… not only is it Georgia’s favourite team it’s also their
favourite pastime. Note how the logo features a bird and a bee…
outstanding!
2. Wichita Shockers (NCAA) –

Wichita
is hands down my favourite college team based solely on their team
name. Now if you don’t know why I’m such a big fan of their name… let’s
just say you are a better person than I.
Winner: Liberal Beejays (Minor League Baseball) –

Good
name for a brothel… bad name for a baseball team. Though I must say I’m
considering a road trip to Liberal, talk about a game day experience! I
mean it’s the only place where getting to 3rd base is a given and
there’s always a happy ending. It also brings new meaning to the term
“left handed middle relief” and “fan appreciation night”.
*Don’t ask me what I was Googling when I came across this team.
Monday, March 4, 2019
Monday Morning Sentimonies: Rider Prophet Salutes Bad Jerseys
Today's post will be the blogging equivalent of a clip show. I'm too lazy to come up with something new so I'm bringing back a post from a few years ago instead. Look, you try coming up with original content for over a decade without resorting to drugs or outright copyright infringement (a may flirt with such infringement but never outright). Anyways, enjoy my salute to Bad Jerseys which contains at least 10% new content.
Rider Prophet Salutes Bad Jerseys (originally posted in March 2010)
For many years, jerseys for sports teams were pretty simple… they had a white one and a coloured one and was usually limited to the team name or a logo. Then somewhere along the hippie artsy-fartsy crowd decided that the existing jerseys were too plain or lacked feng shui or whatever it is those beatniks call it and began coming up with new designs. Then the marketing crowd came along and realized just how much potential money could be made off these hippies and ever since there has been a never ending stream of new jersey designs.
11 - LA Kings
The infamous Burger King jerseys. They made Gretzky wear this... that should have been a criminal offense.
Look
I’m a Habs fan and even I have to admit that these were the worst
jerseys I have ever seen. They look more like audition for Where’s Waldo gone wrong or “Wear Your Pyjamas To Work Day” than the most storied franchise in hockey history. It also says CAC on the front. Say it out loud and you'll see why its funny.
Rider Prophet Salutes Bad Jerseys (originally posted in March 2010)
For many years, jerseys for sports teams were pretty simple… they had a white one and a coloured one and was usually limited to the team name or a logo. Then somewhere along the hippie artsy-fartsy crowd decided that the existing jerseys were too plain or lacked feng shui or whatever it is those beatniks call it and began coming up with new designs. Then the marketing crowd came along and realized just how much potential money could be made off these hippies and ever since there has been a never ending stream of new jersey designs.
Now many of these new designs are successful but as you’ll see below, many of them end up being massive failures. For the purposes of this list I'm excluding the NFL Color Rush experiment (remember those vomit inducing Jaguars jerseys?) and also any of those special one night only jerseys that abound in the junior and minor leagues.
Top 15 Worst Jerseys
15 - Pittsburgh Pirates
Let's see, giant ugly pirate face on the front, numbers and names that are trying to be new and cool and go in new directions but failing miserably. Yup, this is a good way to start off our list.
14 - Pittsburgh Steelers
Early in this list and already 2 appearances by Pittsburgh, what is it with that city? These jerseys look like a cross between a prisoner uniform and a Grade 3 art project. It almost made your stomach ill watching these fly around the field
13 - Birmingham Baracudas
Both the Mad Dogs and Cudas experiment with the front logo and nipple numbers. Can't see why it didn't catch on. Throw in some bad 90s colour palette and the made up word CUDA on the front and you have a jersey almost as bad as the team that wore it.
12 - St Louis Blues
This jersey was so hideous that the coach nixed the idea and refused to wear them so the story goes. It's a shame the world was denied these beauties.11 - LA Kings
The infamous Burger King jerseys. They made Gretzky wear this... that should have been a criminal offense.
Although the rainbow-ish shirts leave a lot to be desired, my bigger concern
is the questionable choice to place the numbers directly next to a
player’s crotch. Generally speaking, that’s not the first place I look
when I’m trying to identify someone. “Hey, you figured out my number 2
minutes ago, now you are just being creepy!”
**Anyone else think the white guy looks kinda like Ricky Ray?
If you were going to prominently feature a timid, cute, non-threatening looking bear on your jerse
y
you could have at least gone with a more publicly recognized bear such
as Winnie the Pooh, Baloo or at the very least put a forest ranger’s hat
on him to make it look more like Smokey.
8 – Vancouver Canucks
It honestly looks like they ran out of money for equipment and were forced to decorate a set of plain black jerseys in coordinating lines of duct tape.
7 – Seattle Seahawks
Apparently Seattle didn’t get the memo that the “Everything automatically becomes cooler with neon green” phase died back in the early 90s.
6 – Denver Nuggets
It’s fitting that Denver is know as the mile-high city since clearly whoever designed this jersey was also extremely high. I’m shocked that the “Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dream Coat” look never caught on.
5 – New York Islanders
The only explanation I can think for this jersey is that Captain Highliner secretly cut a sponsorship deal with the Islanders.
A jersey such as this is what happens when you base a professional hockey
franchise on an Emilio Estevez movie, create a spin-off cartoon series
based on that hockey team and prominently feature a character from that
cartoon series on the hockey team’s alternate jersey. It’s a wonder more
teams haven’t followed suit.
3 – Philadelphia Eagles
Marketing
lesson #1 – In a town notorious for the toughness and aggressiveness of
its sports teams and its fans, a delicate blend of pastel colours is
likely not going to be well received.
1 – Montreal Canadiens
1 – Dallas Stars
Marketing lesson #2 - Logos that look suspiciously like a uterus will likely end up being huge failures.
Monday, February 25, 2019
Monday Morning Sentimonies: Where To From Here?
Well, we might as well talk football. Gotta do something to take our minds off the dreadful cold snap we're going through. It's been cold so long here than even Bomber fans think its been a long time (and they measure lengths of time in decades). Just for the record, putting on sunglasses and a sumbrero and drinking margaritas while listening to Hawaiian music only helps beat the cold until you run out of booze and the hangover kicks in.
Obviously we are all excited that the 2020 Grey Cup is coming back to Regina. My liver has been forewarned and will be starting training immediately. While it is exciting news, I thought the video of the people jumping up and down and screaming at the announcement was a bit ridiculous. That had to be faked right? The motto for 2020 had better be "Experience Regina" or we are missing out on a marketing gold mine here.
Anyway, now that Free Agent Frenzy has passed I thought I'd take a look at what roster building is left for the Riders before training camp and where they might find the needed pieces.
QB - My guess is that the 3 we currently have signed will be the 3 we enter the season with but we do need at least one more arm in camp. Maybe Paul Jones can turn the tide of terrible QB recruiting we've been on. The good news is that it won't be Brandon Bridge. He's a good guy, a good Canadian but just not a good QB.
RB - Pretty much set, through the combo of Powell and Thigpen gives us the oldest RB combo since... well since Messam and Thigpen last year. Be nice to find a new recruit to stash on the practice roster and develop for when one of the old guys throws his back out while yelling at an episode of Matlock.
WR - Given Roosevelt's durability concerns and Arceneaux's who knows when he'll play concerns, I would like to bring another vet WR into camp to make it a real competition. Chris Matthews and Terrence Tolliver are still out there but I doubt we bring a "name" guy like them in. We've done well recruiting WRs of late so hopefully we can unearth one or 2 more.
Canadian WR - We're in trouble here. Watson is old. Lavoie is more of a utility FB/TE/part time SB than a fulltime solution. I'd love Picton to be awesome but at this point with Harty out again everything currently rests that. This will need to be a priority position in the draft unless we can swing a trade. We could always bring back Bagg or Bailey, which would seem to fit O'Day's current MO.
O-line - We are actually pretty solid here. Both starting tackles are back and we have 5 Canadians for the 3 starting interior spots. I'd still love to find a centre so we can finally end the Dan Clark experiment but I've given up hope on that. We do need at least one more Canadian for depth. St John is still out there. Also Dakota Shepley has yet to sign in the NFL (he would be a huge add). We will also likely look to draft here as well.
D-line - We pretty much have our 6 man rotation set (Hughes, Leonard, Geter, Johnson, Evans, Henry). We have guys like Maggit and Edwards back to compete for the import depth. We could use at least one more Canadian body to back up Evans. Steele is still out there but we will likely lean more to developing young guys like Breton or Mufata or drafting for depth.
LB - We almost have too many Canadian LBs but I guess there are worse problems to have. Assuming Dyshawn Davis and at least one new recruit at LB pan out we should be OK. That said, with guys like Knox and Ball still available another vet would be good.
DBs - Are starting 5 are rock solid. Depth behind them... particularly Edem is scary. We could always have Elam at safety and play an extra Cdn LB if needed but I'd rather have some actual depth behind Edem (beyond Radford who is an emergency fill in). Likely need to draft for that but guys like Adam Thibault and Anthony Thompson are still out there. Our back up import DBs will come from new recruits. We seem to be good for at least one stud DB recruit per year so fingers crossed that continues. Eli Bouka just got cut from the NFL. He's a free agent but hopefully we earned some good will by releasing him early to take that NFL opportunity. He will fill that need nicely.
Special Teams - We are set and likely just waiting for the right offer to trade Crapigna. If we had to keep him around have 2 solid kickers is not awful but he should have value and we have greater needs. My guess is we hold onto him until training camp waiting for another team to get desperate.
Obviously we are all excited that the 2020 Grey Cup is coming back to Regina. My liver has been forewarned and will be starting training immediately. While it is exciting news, I thought the video of the people jumping up and down and screaming at the announcement was a bit ridiculous. That had to be faked right? The motto for 2020 had better be "Experience Regina" or we are missing out on a marketing gold mine here.
Anyway, now that Free Agent Frenzy has passed I thought I'd take a look at what roster building is left for the Riders before training camp and where they might find the needed pieces.
QB - My guess is that the 3 we currently have signed will be the 3 we enter the season with but we do need at least one more arm in camp. Maybe Paul Jones can turn the tide of terrible QB recruiting we've been on. The good news is that it won't be Brandon Bridge. He's a good guy, a good Canadian but just not a good QB.
RB - Pretty much set, through the combo of Powell and Thigpen gives us the oldest RB combo since... well since Messam and Thigpen last year. Be nice to find a new recruit to stash on the practice roster and develop for when one of the old guys throws his back out while yelling at an episode of Matlock.
WR - Given Roosevelt's durability concerns and Arceneaux's who knows when he'll play concerns, I would like to bring another vet WR into camp to make it a real competition. Chris Matthews and Terrence Tolliver are still out there but I doubt we bring a "name" guy like them in. We've done well recruiting WRs of late so hopefully we can unearth one or 2 more.
Canadian WR - We're in trouble here. Watson is old. Lavoie is more of a utility FB/TE/part time SB than a fulltime solution. I'd love Picton to be awesome but at this point with Harty out again everything currently rests that. This will need to be a priority position in the draft unless we can swing a trade. We could always bring back Bagg or Bailey, which would seem to fit O'Day's current MO.
O-line - We are actually pretty solid here. Both starting tackles are back and we have 5 Canadians for the 3 starting interior spots. I'd still love to find a centre so we can finally end the Dan Clark experiment but I've given up hope on that. We do need at least one more Canadian for depth. St John is still out there. Also Dakota Shepley has yet to sign in the NFL (he would be a huge add). We will also likely look to draft here as well.
D-line - We pretty much have our 6 man rotation set (Hughes, Leonard, Geter, Johnson, Evans, Henry). We have guys like Maggit and Edwards back to compete for the import depth. We could use at least one more Canadian body to back up Evans. Steele is still out there but we will likely lean more to developing young guys like Breton or Mufata or drafting for depth.
LB - We almost have too many Canadian LBs but I guess there are worse problems to have. Assuming Dyshawn Davis and at least one new recruit at LB pan out we should be OK. That said, with guys like Knox and Ball still available another vet would be good.
DBs - Are starting 5 are rock solid. Depth behind them... particularly Edem is scary. We could always have Elam at safety and play an extra Cdn LB if needed but I'd rather have some actual depth behind Edem (beyond Radford who is an emergency fill in). Likely need to draft for that but guys like Adam Thibault and Anthony Thompson are still out there. Our back up import DBs will come from new recruits. We seem to be good for at least one stud DB recruit per year so fingers crossed that continues. Eli Bouka just got cut from the NFL. He's a free agent but hopefully we earned some good will by releasing him early to take that NFL opportunity. He will fill that need nicely.
Special Teams - We are set and likely just waiting for the right offer to trade Crapigna. If we had to keep him around have 2 solid kickers is not awful but he should have value and we have greater needs. My guess is we hold onto him until training camp waiting for another team to get desperate.
Monday, February 18, 2019
Monday Morning Sentimonies: Assessing Free Agency
Reaction to the Riders’ moves since free agency
opened on Tuesday have ranged from anger to sadness to apathy to “at least we
didn’t sign Brandon Bridge!”… ok that last one might have been me. The general
consensus though is that people are not happy about how we fared in relation to the rest
of the West division.
Let me start out by stating what should be
obvious… Grey Cups are not won on paper based on rosters on Day 2 of free agency.
Many teams have been crowned the “winners of free agency” only to have it be
the biggest victory they manage that season (the 2016 Riders and Winnipeg many,
many times come to mind). A lot can still happen between now and the regular season.
Also, keep in mind that the Riders won 12 games last season and retained a
large part of their core. We are not in a full rebuild mode so the lack of a
flurry of moves does not mean we are screwed. This is to hopefully clam down
the overly outraged portion of Rider Nation (not sure that is possible, but one
can try).
Let me also state something to address the
other side of spectrum... the overly optimistic members of Rider Nation. The
Riders’ key weakness last season was the lack of anything resembling a passing
game. So what did O’Day do to remedy that? Re-signed a QB with a concerning
concussion history and equipped him with a bunch of 30+ year old receivers with
injury concerns of their own. You’ll forgive us for not finding that very confidence
building. On paper we currently have the 5th best passing attack in
the west (and I don’t even think it is close). Not doom and gloom but just
honest.
I think many of criticism’s being thrown at O’Day
are unfair. Lack of signings does not mean lack of effort on his part. We know
for sure he made a huge offer to Bo Levi Mitchell. He was also for sure pushing
for Derel Walker and Shaq Johnson (probably others too). So did he do nothing?
No, he tried hard. Did he improve the team from where we ended 2018? I would also argue no.
Let’s look at who we did sign.
Zach
Collaros – Look, by virtue of not
being geographically closer to Seattle than Vancouver, we never had a shot at
Mike Reilly. We tried our darndest but Mitchell was unlikely to leave Calgary
anyway. As for Harris, we lacked the connections that Edmonton had. I told you
heading into free agency that we were unlikely to land one of the big 3 (it's as if I was prophetic in that statement). In
terms of combing the left overs, Collaros isn’t the worst option (now being the not the worst of a bunch of bad options doesn't make it great but...). He’s familiar
with our system (this will be the first time in a long time where we have the same OC and QB in back to back seasons). He had his moments. Hiss durability is concerning as hell to
me but O’Day opting for a known quantity over a question mark like Jennings is
not the worst decision. Doesn’t make us better but doesn’t make us worse.
Cody
Fajardo – So do we pronounce the
J like in fajita or it a silent J like in jogging? By virtue of not being
Brandon Bridge I like this already. We needed a back-up for Collaros and rather
than bring in old men like Lulay or Glenn, we opt for a 26 year old with 3
years CFL experience. Will he amount to anything? Who knows but at least we are
looking towards the future at QB for once. Lord knows we can't recruit a QB to save our soul.
William
Powell – Powell is an impact RB
no question and given Tre Mason’s injury we did need someone. I’m always hesitant
to spend on a “name” RB when you should be able to recruit one… also Powell is
31 (a theme among O’Day’s signings). But given that I don’t see our passing
game improving anytime soon, a strong running game is needed and Powell gives
us that. This move more shored up an existing strength rather than improving
our O as a whole.
Micah
Johnson – This is THE big
signing for us. Johnson is the best DT in the CFL. Pairing him with Evans makes
for one hell of a push up the middle. This is a great signing! I do wonder how quickly him and Labatte will make up. They did not like each other at all the last time we met.
AC
Leonard – I always thought
Leonard was overrated and benefited from playing beside Jefferson in his first
run here. That said he did hold his own in Ottawa, notching 6 sacks on a far weaker line. As a rotation DE along with
Geter I think we should be ok along the D-line when you consider who the other
starting 3 are.
Namaam
Roosevelt – When we struck on all
the other top end WRs out there it was predictable that we came back to
Roosevelt. I love the guy. He is a heart and soul player. I would have preferred
finding a younger #1 WR with less miles on them but he’s an OK consolation.
Manny
Arceneaux – The value of this
signing depends completely on his timeline for being healthy. Arceneaux says he’s
pushing to be in training camp but there are unconfirmed reports that Labour Day is more
likely. Much like Roosevelt, Manny is the wrong side of 30 and has a ton of
miles on him but when healthy dude can still be an impact player.
Cory
Watson – Makes Manny and Roosy
seem like youngn’s by comparison. I guess as a depth Cdn WR he’s OK but with
Harty once again lost to injury we need a lead Cdn WR not just depth. Solid meh
on this one.
Dyshawn
Davis – Very solid special
teams guy (22 ST tackles last season). May be a guy who is ready for a larger
role on defense. He will hopefully be in the mix to replace Eguavoen.
So here’s my overall assessment of Free Agency: Underwhelmed. It’s not doom and gloom but we are arguably a worse team at this point then
when we ended the season. Defense was our strength last season (and by that I mean
they bailed our asses out of sure defeat on many occasions). We lost 3 of our
top impact players in Jefferson, Anitgha and Eguavoen and replaced them with Johnson. A one for 3 swap is not great.
On offense we improved our run game which was not a weakness last season. In the
passing game we essentially changed nothing. Swap Williams-Lambert for
Arceneaux essentially. I expect guys like Moore, Cannon and Evans to take a
step forward in year 2 but will it be enough to keep pace in the West?
We still have the draft and recruiting to fill
out our roster and some of our best players have come from there in the past
(Moncrief, Eguavoen, Marshall, Antigha, Lambert, Cofield, Geter). O’Day
approached free agency like an old lady at a supermarket, looking only for
deals and not wanting to spend big money. He is betting on the existing core of
this team and their recruiting ability. Will it work out? Who knows. I have my
doubts but I’m certainly not about to write off the season in February.
Monday, February 11, 2019
Monday Morning Sentimonies: Free Agency Primer
Free agency opens tomorrow across the CFL
(though truthfully covert tampering has been going on for months). It will be
interesting to see what strategy new GM Jeremy O’Day will take to free agency.
Will he want to make a big splash to assert his place as a top dog in this
league? Will be take a cautious approach and opt more to build from within?
Will he do what Chris Jones always did and sign a bunch of guys that he ends up
cutting before mid-season? Who knows?
Let’s take a look at our needs:
QB – It’s already been talked about endlessly but
in case you have been living under a rock (or live in Manitoba and lack the
electricity and 3rd grade education required to read internet
content) the Riders need a QB.
Whose out there?
There are essentially 3 tiers available on the
market.
1 Elite – (Mike Reilly, Bo Levi Mitchell, Trevor Harris) – These
guys are gonna get paid. Get the money, dollar dollar bills y’all. Odds are
Reilly to BC, Bo to the NFL or a return to Calgary, and Harris stays in Ottawa
but you can bet we will be making big time offers. Bo is the interesting one
for me. He’s in an interesting spot where he may want to hold out to see if a
decent NFL offer arises but if he wants to maximize his CFL $$ he needs to sign
quickly. Teams can’t afford to wait in limbo on a $600K+ contract offer.
2 – Serviceable – (Jonathan Jennings, Kevin Glenn). At least 5 teams will be
vying for the big 3 QB. A few of them are going to lose out. Despite their
glaring deficiencies, in a very thin QB market guys like Jennings and Glenn
suddenly look better than nobody. Obviously Jennings (based on age) is the
preferred guy but as long have you have an alternate plan come playoffs I do
think Kevin Glenn can get you there.
3 – Last Resorts (Travis Lulay, Zach Collaros)
– Look when healthy these 2 are
great options but if you honestly think you can count on either as a fulltime
starter at this point you simply have not been paying attention. If you have a
young guy you want to take a chance on, either would make a great back-up
option.
Outlook: I don’t see us landing one of the big 3 (though we will
certainly try). I’ve been touting Jennings as a likely target since the season
ended. If not him then as sad as it is to say, we are probably looking at
rolling with a combo of a young guy and either Glenn or Collaros. You’ll note
that Brandon Bridge did not even crack my Last Resort list. I stand by that
evaluation.
D-Line – Clearly we all want Willie back, if for no other reason
than his long draw out touchdown runs. But if he is not in the cards then we
need another strong end. Hughes still has a lot left in the tank (clearly) but
his production declined as the season wore on and at his age I don’t think he
can carry a D-line by himself for a full season. We also need some Cdn depth
for Zach Evans.
Who is out there? Willie Jefferson, Ja’Gared Davis, Frank Beltre, Ken
Bishop, Victor Butler, Shawn Lemon, Tristan Okpalaugo, Cordarro
Law, Jesse Joseph(cdn),
Eddie Steele (cdn)
Outlook
– The NFL is a possibility for Jefferson but I do
think if he stays in the CFL, we will be willing to pay him what it takes to
retain him. If not him then I think the next most likely is either Okpalaugo or
Law.
Wide
Receiver – Two main needs here.
We need a go-to #1 receiver… unless we run the same offense as last year, then
never mind. Lots of big names will be hitting the market and this is a place I
could see O’Day spending some money. The other need is somewhat contingent on
the health of Jake Harty (remember him?) In theory, if he is healthy, then we
are in good shape at Cdn WR but if there are lingering health concerns then we
may need to add someone, even if just for depth
Who is out there? Da’Varis Daniels, Derel Walker, Manny Arceneaux, DeVier Posey,
BJ Cunningham, Greg Ellingson, Chris Matthews, Kenny Stafford, Namaan Roosevelt,
Terrence Tolliver. For Cdns, Nic Demksi, Juwan Brescasin Nate Behar, Shaq
Johnson, Mike Jones
Outlook: The only “big” name guy I could see us landing is
Ellingson (at which point people would suddenly remember and be outraged about
his DUI that has been forgotten about). Outside of that we are more likely to
land a Cunningham, Matthews or Stafford. I don’t see us spending big on Cdn WR.
Linebacker
– There is a giant Sam Eguavoen-sized
hole in our linebacking core. It will be tough to replace a player of his
calibre but we do need to look at someone who can at least start in his place.
Who is out there? Jeff Knox, Jovon Santon-Knox, Maleki Harris, Micah Awe, Bo
Lokombo, Larry Dean, Simoni Lawrence, Marcus Ball
Outlook – Jeff Knox strikes me as the most likely both from a cost
and fit perspective.
Offensive
Line – Need depth. For once
we actually had OL depth last year and we need that to continue. Last year we
lost Bladek, Clark and Labatte (a few plays here and there) but managed to not
be overly impacted by that as we had St John, Blake and Schram to step in. While we still have Blake and Schram in
addition to the starters from last year (Labatte, Clark, Bladek) so we are in
decent shape but one more Canadian OL would be good. This need goes away if
2018 draft pick Dakota Shepley ends up signing but there still appears to be
NFL interest in him.
Who is out there? Josiah St John, Jon Gott, Suhk Chung, Tyler Holmes, Phillippe
Gagnon
Outlook: I doubt we sign a big name player like Chung or Holmes but
a Gott or Gagnon are a possibility as is a return for St John.
Depth
at safety – Depth behind Mike
Edem does not exist. This is a bold strategy. Thing is there isn’t much out
there for depth. There are top end guys like Loffler and Ackie but with Edem
already locked up I don’t us targeting them.
Who is out there? Anthony Thompson, Tunde
Adeleke
Outlook:
Most likely we need to look at the draft to address this.
CFL Ins and Outs
Saskatchewan
In: DB
Mike Edem, DL Makana Henry (contract extension), DB Valentino Blake, RB Taye Davis, DL BJ McBryde, WR Doug McNeil,
LB Deion Pierre, LB Louy Compton (free agent signing)
Calgary
In: RB
Terry Williams, LB Cory Greenwood, OL Brad Erdos, LB Wynton McManis, OL Shane
Bergman, OL Ucambre Williams, DB Brandon Smith, DB Jamar Wall (contract
extension) LB Dwayne Norman (free agent signing)
BC
In: WR
Bryan Burnham, DB TJ Lee, RB Wayne Moore (contract extension), WR Marquess
Wilson (free agent signing)
Edmonton
In: DL
Kwaku Boateng, WR Kevin Elliot, LB Taylor Reed, WR Natey Adjei, LB Korey Jones,
LB Blair Smith (contract extension), WR Kenny Shaw, DL Gabriel Bagnell, WR
Harry McMaster, WR Bryce Bobo, WR Anthony Mahoungou, LB Caleb Bailey, DB BJ
Clay, DL Ben Sorensen (free agent signing)
Winnipeg
In: DL
Jackson Jeffcoat, DB Anthony Gaitor, LB Shane Gauthier, LB Thomas Miles, DB
Jeff Hecht, LB Kyrie Wilson (contract extension) QB Bryan Schor, WR Garrett
Johnson, RB Jalen Simmons, DB Mykkele Thompson, WR Rasheed Bailey, WR Don
Williams, DB Dexter Janke (free agent signing)
Out: OL
Matthias Goosen (retired)
Hamilton
In: WR
Brandon Banks, RB Alex Green, DB Mike Daly, DL Nikita Whitlock, DL Justin
Vaughn, DB Cariel Brooks, DB Richard Leonard (contract extension) WR Rashad
Lawrence, WR Cam Echols-Luper, QB DeVante Kincade, RB Ray Lawry. DB Robert
Porter, DB Joel Ross, DL Jamal Marcus, LB Chris Frey, DL Joel Van Pelt (free
agent)
Ottawa
In: QB
Dominique Davis, OL Jason Lauzon-Seguin, DL Avery Ellis, DB Jonathan Rose, DL
Michael Klassen (contract extension) DB Chris Randle (free agent)
Toronto
In: DB
Robert Woodson, DB Jermaine Gabriel, LB Terrance Plummer, LB Bear Woods, OL
Chris Kolankowski, WR Alex Charette, OL DJ Sackey, DB Abdul Kanneh, RB Brandon Burks,
LB Akeem Jordan, DB Alden Darby, FB Simon Gingras-Gagnon (contract extension),
DB Devin Butler, DB Trey Caldwell (free agent signing)
Montreal
In: LS
Martin Bedard (contract extension)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)














